Відео

I visualized it like this The view is like tilting a mirror... the whole reflection shrinks so no snap.

If Newton's universal law of gravity doesn't exist, why do objects still have weight! A man 84 kg on earth would 14 kg on the moon, why it's different! How time dilation affect the mass of weight!?

Ugh yes you did set off my google assistant :P

2:11 how you forget the dear neutrinos 😲

Ive always wondered, when we falk about "1 picosecond from the big bang", how does relativity translate that period of time to what we'd perceive? If most energy in the universe was photons before things cooled moving at C, does "1 picosecond" actually mean "fast?"

i like how you have a chemistry book underneath a lot of stuffies LOL

Something I don't get though, is to say that quantum superposition is in someway 'intrinsic' to atomic and subatomic particles. If we say "there's 30% probability it will be A and 70% probability it will be B"... Might there not be a reason WHY it is A or B which we are simply unaware of? It just doesn't seem very scientifc to me to simply say something like "it might rain, it might not rain.. but it will probably rain (although yes of course, with concrete and real probabilities and not figurative ones)" My doubt is summed up in that phrase that goes "randomness is ignorance of forces unknown to us" or the like Please enlighten me

Very interesting video! Don't you support Feynman's ideas? I do. I also don't think the superposition state and wave convergence are correct. The Copenhagen interpretation combines Einstein's idea of ​​wave packets with Max Born's probability interpretatio. But waves do not exist. Only Max Born's probability interpretation is correct. If the superposition state is incorrect, there is nothing mysterious. ● Regarding Schrödinger's cat experiment, Schrödinger is correct. ● There is no need to consider quantum teleportation. Please continue to share your thoughts in your videos. I wish you the best of luck.

You, Sir, are a Master! I love your humor, and I respect your intelligence. For me, this was the perfect explanation of “superposition”. I’m not sure that Schrödinger’s cat feels any more secure in that darned box… Wayne, The-Pain-From-Maine…

Nice description. Identifying the second derivative as the curvature and distinguishing its behavior in one equation from the other is particularly insightful. This intuition beautifully agrees with the solution of the 1-D diffusion equation, where the two curvatures of opposite signs (one at the head and two at the tails) cause the head of the gaussian function to come down with time, while its tails grow in height. When I first understood the diffusion equation during my early days of learning, it gave me a better physical insight into the dynamics of the Schrödinger equation. I feel it's always nicer to view the Schrödinger equation as a form of diffusion equation describing a complex function, which interestingly gets called as the 'wave function'.

The big bang didn't happen anywhere because it created the where itself

What about conformal cyclical cosmology? Couldn't we yet still get the good graph of "bumps" ?

But why would the universe have to start as a an extremely small object? Could it not as easily started at something that what was much bigger? Why do we extrapolate the current expansion to a small single point that becomes a singularity and not something larger? Great video!

Man, I remember when this came out and I watched it and said cool cool, and then I took electromagnetics and signals and systems for my major and that wave description hits differently. Thank you Nick for this awesome video, aged finely like wine for me.

Every moment on the continuum has infinite discrete values between just like the naturals 😂

I think that capitalism is the great filter that nobody has survived in the galaxy and we are not going to survive neither

Apply this concept to explain the Double Slit Experiment under Observation which effects the nature of light as either a wave or particles.

So what we "see" as light is really just our eyes being a detector of a wave in the "photon field" ?

Wow, I can't believe I actually understood at least most of it and came to the same conclusion as you did in the review section. Never really understood the concept of superposition before, I guess it really is pure maths thrust into physics though lol. Anyway, I got mindblown by your explanation in this video, its a very similar feeling to when I learned early concepts in physics. It's like you demonstrated how to straighten out a complicated knot.

Why do the Friedmann equations not include magnetism which is a form of energy?

There is a nuanded truth of the human soul which exists along the sacramental reality of seven lagrage points. We Cathokics caĺl them The Seven Sacramets. Your religion may call them somethimg else. But they deeply reflect our Seven Sscraments. ❤

I think the stellar nucleosythesis for stars is miscolored. The sun is medium mass star so carbon and oxygen should shaded green

Wait a minute! Light doesn’t have mass, then how does it spin the radiometer?

Does the idea that the big bang is space just expanding and taking everything with it, mean that our Galaxies are gnarly surfer dudes?

I don't know if you are still reading these comments, but I was just watching the Richard Feynman lecture from the University of Aukland. I believe the lecture series was titled "Today's Answers to Newton's Queries about Light." In that he described the "wave-particle" duality as a state of confusion before people knew what was going on. But he quickly followed up by emphatically stating that light (and other such tiny building blocks) are particles. Very emphatic in that. But you are saying even more emphatically that they are waves. Can you help me understand? My understanding is that they are particles, but the differential equations that govern their motion are not analogous to those of classical mechanics. These particles move probabilistically, and you compute probabilities by summing/integrating the probability amplitudes for any possible path, then taking the conjugate-square of that result. The probability amplitudes, I believe, are computed by what we call the "wave function," but in another video I think you did a good job explaining that this first-order differential equation was more akin to a heat flow differential equation rather than a second-order vibrating string equation.

I don't quite get the concept of why objects with more mass would cause more time variation hence more gravity.

The rest 367,116 earths in sun’s volume is those gaps

I think for this scale model, you can move up if there’s a ladder or stairs or something so that you can see the sun tire

Womderful

what is not affected by time? what is not affected by space? light and quantum particles.want to travel spacetime? thats all you need to know.....

I thought the hydrogen on earth was created from radioactive decay

"I don't like determinism because I want to have free will" doesn't sound very scientific to me.

What happens when the dimension is not an integer value? Can tensors apply to fractal dimensions? I cannot think of any practical examples of this. Maybe spinors? What does a tensor say about symmetries? How does the tensor apply with inversion?

Love polarized sunglasses when driving at noon

No! You are going to have to count each bead.

New ways of looking at gravity

Maybe I missed it ?? But the whole premise & explanation works on the effect that, the further from earth, time moves slightly faster ... BUT WHY DOES TIME MOVE FASTER AT THOSE "Higher altitudes " ??

Both light and electromagnetic waves are called waves. Is the wave going out from point A to point B? Or is it already at points A and B like the sea, but only the waves are transmitted? In modern science, it seems to be seen as the former... / What about time and space? In modern science, time and space are the latter, don't you think? / In other words, space-time comes first, and light, photons and protons go along that path... / So the Einsteinian school's absolute speed of light is strange? At the absolute speed of light, is not the speed determined by light, but by the time and space that already exists? Isn't speed the time to move from point A to point B? If time and space are not absolutely fixed, why does the speed of light have absolute speed? / Therefore, the absolute speed of light can also be wrong. Isn't the absolute speed of light a space-time dimensional barrier? If it exceeds the absolute speed, will it jump to another dimension? / Einstein's theory is based on the dimension only now, so if you go beyond this dimension, is not it beyond the constraints of Einstein? / The question is whether you can find an object faster than light or accelerate light. Or is space-time and massive mass spread out in front of us, and can not we cross the space-time dimension using space-time and massive mass? / In this sense, I think we should study whether there is a way to send signals to the past. You don't have to worry about who in the past will get this signal, do you? We're already receiving a 24-hour signal from radio telescopes and various receivers.

I got six, I got eight, on fifteen I guessed eleven and then reguessed 15 before the answer was given. I don't actually recall seeing the flash for 23 the first time before hearing the answer, and with 57 the answer followed up so quick that I wasn't able to think any words before it was provided.

Gravity is not for free

Anthropomorphism: Giving human traits or qualitys to inanimate objects. ( Ie) Our old car "Betsy" gets grumpy and hard to start on cold mornings.

The hottest possible temperature is called: Planck temperature

Three years forward and Many Worlds interpretation is more or less out of fashion... and almost every UA-cam-commenting physicist is criticizing and dissing it (for the same reasons as shown in the video). And some of them started pointing towards Superdeterminism - interpretation that has locality, causality, and determinism but with hidden variables??? - (i think so, not really sure)

I think you should picture the unconvential spacetime diagram as 3 dimensions: 2 for space and 1 for time

You forgot m type brown dwarfs. M type brown dwarfs are red dwarfs have spectral type M5.5 or later

My plan is to make a solar system model. The scale is 150 million to 1. This means 1 au equals 1 km in that scale

If you see green or purple stars, it could means that star is redshifted or blueshifted, it could means a comet or asteroid or a planet

Fun fact: The hottest possible temperature, the planck temperature, is where the wavelength emitted by the black-body reaches the planck length

Parabolic and hyperbolic paths are called trajectory instead of orbits because they aren’t bound

If you know all laws of physics maybe. Truthfully scientists don't know how the 4 fundamental forces are formed or where they come from . Just so many topics with holes of data missing. So why do scientists think they are going to figure out the entire universe in a little equation of a couple inches long. Wishful thinking and the reason it hasn't happened